This film, despite appearances, is serious. As narrative convention is really nothing original: the plot revolves around a group of Harvard university, one a nerd obsessed with the conventions of the acceptance of the mythical fraternity, his tolerant and more normal best friend really does not need the friendship of this, the parasite superstar breaking this friendship, boys athletic, blond and handsome who want to fuck the nerd and, of course, the issue of who is better at that and the corresponding reward. While The Social Network is a film based on true events about the creation & OverhaulI n an indisputable generational phenomenon and as this very fine film guióny achieved, the main merit of David Fincher is that it provides the best geek film of all time: Do not be fooled In, The Social Network is not a docudrama, is fine and masterly version of Revenge of the Nerds .
This is very typical of Fincher, the director to assure the Fox his adaptation of Fight Club on tape would not "cheap" type Trainspotting. The guy has a taste for pop corn, entertainment and the expectation that his films raise moneyor at the box office without any of this affect a clear ability to tell stories in an interesting and sometimes authorial voice. Well, not many outside of the programming emprededurismo find it very fascinating story of the creation of Facebook, but David Fincher makes it a little round film event: even better than Zodiac and The Game .
Frankly much of the merit of the film deserves Aaron Sorkin, the screenwriter, because it seems easy to tell a story that is not so. The heart is something that anyone who is past for the preparation and / or university can be identified: that good friends" x" or "and" fight. Sometimes " x " is a radical argument about a film, sometimes "and" can be a girl that the other was a queríay who encourage and the win. A little later in life, " x" may be a project or vision that comes between friends while adrift in roles as "leader", "counselor" or "priming" and Obviously it is in sorrow. This event is so routine and so widespread that surely all of us forget at the end of weeks, months or at most, a couple dand years. But Fincher change a single variable: x here is not a class project or difference of opinion on the Star Wars prequels : the creation of a website in less than 6 years reached a billion dollar valuation, in fact it is likely that the vast majority of those who enter to see the film belong to the millions of fellows enrolled in the website.
Now if we consider that at the heart of a billion dollar company there is the story of best friends turned into enemies, it will be something interesting in the behavior of these. In this aspect the script isfrankly brilliant, does tell the story of the creation of the site since its inception and who got mixed with the They were exposed under two copyright lawsuits with clarity, without assuming perfect diacroníay trial de position who really did or whom deserves. The characters in this film are supernally written and acted even better: they are charismatic and such a personality that really can not encased in roles of "nerd", "noble" or "bad athlete" . I do not ever have the pleasure to meet you, but I doubt that Mark Zuckerberg, Eduardo Saverin, or are the twins Winklevoss mitad interesting and charismatic in real life as they are represented in this film. One can not help but feel so much sympathy that one does not judging him to whatever its supposed to be trans.
is clear that the first applicant, Saverin (successfully performed for the next Spider-Man Andrew Gardfield), had a sincere interest in protecting his best friend but also is noteworthy that also underestimated as the nerd who was supposedly good. It is also clear that the brightness of Sean "Napster" Parker (Justin Timberlake in one of these papers are made to fit the actor's personal baggage) clouds the view ZuckerRBerG (successfully performed brilliantly by Jesse Eisenberg), but not to the extent that lick the ass without questioning anything. Even the twins fight each will be seen as questioning whether the karaketas that Machio mother to Ralph in the Karate Kid or whether or not the nerd that I have seen their faces twin idiot, and his odyssey small sue protagonist is even fun.
And Zuckerberg the same character, I will address another issue: the alleged "truth" of his narrative. Does it really matters to someone? When a film has not been completely truthful documentary about an event, but even when the dudes rEtrat still alive? Is not it already know more than John Huston's command that dictates "of a fact you have a myth or reality, and reality is never interesting"?. I read that Zuckemberg declare that the film does not record the events truthfully account and that I can say that if Zuckemberg can be considered a genius of the web because it is something stupid in these matters than is the myth, cinema and a frank homage to what is to be your "genius." Go: the end of "the Social Network " Zuckemberg figure is embodied as a nerd and a bit self-conscious type, but not to the point of caricature, its complexity is interesting and shows somelike remorse at the loss of his best friend, besides that is fairly representative of the guy is a workalcholic that if not for the superstar Sean Parker as Facebook had released as public domain, well, that the only pesonajes in the film who is not interested in the billions is to it.
However, Fincher heals itself morally when a lawyer said most of the claims in litigation over intellectual property rights are 85% emotion (as if such jealousy entered this club, or frustration n the upstart who steals from a friend, or the courage to change the nerdecito underestimated the status quo of the "in" and"Out"), which is the basis of the tape and the other 15% are vile lies that seek to hold everything else, and it puts the tape does not get dirty hands per se.
Two
details denouncing the perfectionist like Fincher shit and love that is dedicated to the history, the first, the twins are played by one actor, does not sound impressive but if you put attention that footage is displayed twins together is that the director has acquired enough expertise in both language film as visual resources, and the second is that in the end, after the legends that tell us how things were and the billiard of dollarss blah, immediately begins to sound Baby You Are A Rich Man . The surprise is that the dime is not a cover: the rola originally recorded by the Beatles and can be heard in the Magical Mystery Tour . Rarely heard original versions of the Beatles in the film. Why? Because they cost a shitload of money ... just the rights to use a cover are of 100,000 dollars (hence Across the Universe will go down in film history with the biggest musical investment to spend 10 million dollars in pure rolas rights were cover), the estimate using the original version is of perhaps 300,000 to 400,000 dollarucos ranging rights to World Heritage Siteio the late Michael Jackson (which, hey, if Fincher would give to tell the story of that McCarthy and his amigito Jackson, perhaps also of interest resutalría film).
to note that the score of Trent Reznor is felt: the musical communion reminds Dust Brothers Figth Club. Ironically, Fincher gets more credit and critics' awards for this classic story of money and perjury that the counter proposal will exist more pop than ever in the history of cinema. Perhaps Zuckerberg
to real life, encapsulated in codes screen and sitting on a few billiondollars, does not sound impressive, but trust me, Fincher has made him a love letter: it has become a memorable character cinemtográfico. Without restraint, The Social Network is the best film of David Fincher after Figth Club and Seven : up and forgive him his after blowjob.
0 comments:
Post a Comment